Energetics
Revise Energetics for Chemistry (IAL) — revision notes and instant AI marking. Free to start.
Summary — What This Chapter Covers
- Lattice energy (ΔlattH) — the energy released when gaseous ions come together to form 1 mole of ionic solid. Always exothermic, always huge and negative.
- Born–Haber cycles — a Hess's Law diagram that breaks the formation of an ionic compound into small steps (atomisation, ionisation, electron affinity, lattice formation) so we can calculate the one step we can't measure directly.
- Key enthalpy definitions — atomisation, first/second electron affinity, ionisation energy — each with its own energy "sign" (endo or exo) that you must know cold.
- Polarisation — real ionic bonds aren't 100% ionic. Small, highly-charged cations distort ("polarise") large anions, adding covalent character — which is why experimental and theoretical lattice energies disagree.
- Enthalpy of solution & hydration — what happens energetically when an ionic solid dissolves in water: breaking the lattice apart (endothermic) and hydrating the free ions (exothermic).
- Trends — how ionic radius and ionic charge affect the size of lattice energy and hydration enthalpy (charge density is the master variable).
- Predicting solubility — using entropy (ΔStotal) alongside enthalpy of solution to explain why some ionic solids dissolve and others don't.
1. Born–Haber Key Terms
1.1 Lattice Energy (ΔlattH)
Think of an ionic solid like NaCl as a crowd of positive and negative ions that have "fallen into place" next to each other, held tight by electrostatic attraction. Lattice energy is the enthalpy change when that crowd forms from scratch — starting from ions floating freely as a gas, with no attraction between them at all.
Because oppositely-charged ions want to be near each other, snapping them together into a solid lattice releases a huge amount of energy. That's why lattice energy is always exothermic (a big negative number, often in the hundreds or thousands of kJ mol⁻¹).
Na⁺(g) + Cl⁻(g) → NaCl(s) ΔlattH = −776 kJ mol⁻¹
Why so negative? The bigger (more negative) the lattice energy, the stronger the ionic bonding — because more energy had to be released to pull the ions together, which means the electrostatic attraction between them was very strong.
Write the equation (with state symbols) that represents the lattice energy of magnesium oxide.
1.2 Enthalpy of Atomisation (ΔatH)
Before you can turn an element into ions, you first have to get it into single, separate gas atoms. That's atomisation — and it always costs energy, because you're breaking whatever bonds or forces hold the element together (metallic bonds in a solid metal, or covalent bonds in a diatomic gas like Cl₂).
| Element's standard state | Example equation |
|---|---|
| Solid metal (e.g. Na, K) | Na(s) → Na(g) ΔatH = +108 kJ mol⁻¹ |
| Diatomic gas (e.g. Cl₂) | ½Cl₂(g) → Cl(g) ΔatH = +121 kJ mol⁻¹ |
| Liquid (e.g. Hg) | Hg(l) → Hg(g) |
Write the equation for the standard enthalpy change of atomisation of bromine, given that bromine's standard state is a liquid, Br₂(l).
1.3 Electron Affinity (ΔeaH)
Electron affinity is about an atom (or ion) gaining an electron to become more negative. The first electron affinity is almost always exothermic — an incoming negative electron is attracted to the positive nucleus, so energy is released. But the second electron affinity is a completely different story.
| Step | Equation | Sign |
|---|---|---|
| 1st electron affinity of Cl | Cl(g) + e⁻ → Cl⁻(g) ΔeaH = −364 kJ mol⁻¹ | Exothermic |
| 2nd electron affinity of O | O⁻(g) + e⁻ → O²⁻(g) ΔeaH = +844 kJ mol⁻¹ | Endothermic |
Why does the second one flip sign? Once an atom has already gained one electron, it's now a negatively charged ion (e.g. O⁻). Trying to force a second negative electron onto an already-negative ion means fighting against strong repulsion between like charges. That repulsion has to be overcome with an input of energy — hence endothermic.
Explain why the first electron affinity of chlorine is exothermic, but the second electron affinity of oxygen is endothermic.
2. Constructing Born–Haber Cycles
A Born–Haber cycle is just Hess's Law applied to ionic compounds. The whole idea: there are two different "routes" to get from the elements in their standard states to the finished ionic solid — a short direct route (enthalpy of formation) and a long indirect route (atomisation → ionisation → electron affinity → lattice formation). Since both routes start and end at the same place, they must release/absorb the same total energy.
• Endothermic steps → arrow points up (energy of substances increases)
• Exothermic steps → arrow points down (energy of substances decreases)
Step-by-step: Building the NaCl cycle
Reading this: starting from the elements at the bottom, you can go up and around (atomise → ionise → electron affinity → lattice energy) or go straight down via enthalpy of formation. Both arrive at the same final state, so their total energy changes must be equal.
Worked Example: KCl Cycle
| Step | Equation | Enthalpy term |
|---|---|---|
| Atomise K(s) | K(s) → K(g) | ΔatH(K) |
| Ionise K(g) | K(g) → K⁺(g) + e⁻ | IE₁ |
| Atomise ½Cl₂(g) | ½Cl₂(g) → Cl(g) | ΔatH(Cl) |
| Electron affinity of Cl | Cl(g) + e⁻ → Cl⁻(g) | EA₁ |
| Sum of the above | — | Δ1H |
| Lattice formation | K⁺(g) + Cl⁻(g) → KCl(s) | ΔlattH |
The "direct route" (K(s) + ½Cl₂(g) → KCl(s)) is the enthalpy of formation. The "indirect route" is the sum of every step listed above. By Hess's Law, they're equal — which is exactly how the calculation section works.
Sketch (in words/steps) the six stages needed for a Born–Haber cycle for magnesium oxide, MgO. (Hint: Mg loses 2 electrons, O gains 2 electrons.)
3. Born–Haber Calculations
Once the cycle is drawn, the maths is just Hess's Law rearranged. The full version of the equation lists every single step:
It's much easier to think of it in three simplified chunks:
where Δ1H = the sum of everything needed to turn the elements into gaseous ions (atomisation + ionisation + electron affinity).
Rearranged to solve for the value you usually need — lattice energy:
Worked Example: Lattice Energy of KCl
| ΔatH / kJ mol⁻¹ | IE / EA / kJ mol⁻¹ | |
|---|---|---|
| K | +90 | +418 |
| Cl | +122 | −349 |
ΔfH(KCl) = −437 kJ mol⁻¹
Using the data: ΔatH(Mg) = +148, ΔatH(O) = +248, IE₁(Mg) = +736, IE₂(Mg) = +1450, EA₁(O) = −142, EA₂(O) = +770, ΔfH(MgO) = −602 (all kJ mol⁻¹) — calculate ΔlattH of MgO.
4. Polarisation
Everything so far has assumed a "perfect" ionic model: perfectly spherical ions, purely electrostatic attraction, whole-number charges completely transferred. In reality, bonding is rarely 100% ionic — there's often a bit of covalent character mixed in, and that's what polarisation explains.
Picture a small, densely-charged cation sitting right next to a big, "squishy" anion. The cation's concentrated positive charge pulls on the anion's electron cloud, dragging some electron density toward itself. The anion's shape gets distorted — no longer a perfect sphere — and some electron density is effectively shared between the two ions. That sharing is exactly what covalent bonding is, so the bond now has some covalent character mixed into its ionic character.
Anions: large ionic radius = easily distorted (highly "polarisable")
A quick way to estimate charge density (and hence polarising power):
This is why theoretical lattice energies (calculated assuming pure ionic bonding) sometimes disagree noticeably with experimental lattice energies (measured via Born–Haber cycles using real ΔfH data) — the gap is a measure of how much covalent character is really present.
| NaCl | MgCl₂ | |
|---|---|---|
| Charge density of cation | 111 | 556 |
| Experimental ΔlattH | −780 | −2526 |
| Theoretical ΔlattH | −770 | −2326 |
| Extent of covalent character | very little | more than NaCl |
Which cation would you expect to have greater polarising power: Al³⁺ or Na⁺? Explain your reasoning.
5. Enthalpy of Solution & Hydration
5.1 Key Definitions
KCl(s) + aq → K⁺(aq) + Cl⁻(aq)
Can be exothermic OR endothermic depending on the compound.
Mg²⁺(g) + aq → Mg²⁺(aq)
Always exothermic — new attractions are formed between the ion and water molecules, releasing energy.
Water is a polar molecule — the oxygen atom carries a slight negative charge (δ−) and the hydrogens carry a slight positive charge (δ+). When an ionic solid dissolves, water molecules cluster around each ion: oxygen atoms point toward cations, hydrogen atoms point toward anions. These "ion–dipole attractions" are what make hydration exothermic, and what physically separates and stabilises the free ions in solution.
5.2 The Energy Cycle
There are two routes from gaseous ions to hydrated (aqueous) ions:
where ΔhydH here is the total hydration enthalpy — add together the individual ΔhydH values of the cation and anion.
Worked Example: Hydration Enthalpy of Cl⁻ (from KCl)
Given: ΔlattH(KCl) = −711, ΔsolH(KCl) = +26, ΔhydH(K⁺) = −322 (all kJ mol⁻¹).
ΔhydH = ΔhydH(Mg²⁺) + 2 × ΔhydH(Cl⁻)
Always check the formula for how many moles of each ion are actually present.
Given ΔlattH(MgCl₂) = −2592 kJ mol⁻¹, ΔsolH(MgCl₂) = −55 kJ mol⁻¹, and ΔhydH(Cl⁻) = −363 kJ mol⁻¹, calculate ΔhydH(Mg²⁺).
5.3 Predicting Solubility — Enthalpy AND Entropy
Dissolving isn't just about enthalpy. Two things happen when a solid dissolves: the ordered lattice breaks apart (increasing disorder — entropy goes up) but the free ions then get "trapped" by orderly shells of water molecules around them (decreasing entropy of the water). To predict whether dissolving actually happens, you need the total entropy change, not just ΔsolH alone.
A process is thermodynamically favourable (spontaneous) when ΔStotal is positive.
Worked example — ammonium nitrate at 298 K: ΔsolH = +25.8 kJ mol⁻¹ (endothermic!), ΔSsystem = +108.7 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.
6. Enthalpy Trends: Ionic Charge & Radius
Both lattice energy and hydration enthalpy are governed by the same underlying idea: electrostatic attraction gets stronger when ions are smaller and more highly charged (i.e. when charge density is high). Everything in this section is really just that one idea applied twice.
6.1 Ionic Radius
Why? A bigger ion spreads its charge over a larger volume (lower charge density), and the centres of the ions end up further apart in the lattice. Since electrostatic attraction weakens rapidly with distance, this results in weaker attraction and a less exothermic lattice energy.
Example: Lattice energy of CsF is less exothermic than KF, because Cs⁺ (Period 6) is a much bigger ion than K⁺ (Period 4) — same anion (F⁻), so the difference comes entirely from cation size.
6.2 Ionic Charge
Why? Higher charge means higher charge density, which means stronger electrostatic pull between the ions. More energy is released when the ions fall together — hence a bigger (more negative) lattice energy.
Example: CaO's lattice energy is far more exothermic than KCl's — Ca²⁺/O²⁻ carry double the charge of K⁺/Cl⁻ and are smaller ions, so both factors stack in the same direction.
6.3 Hydration Enthalpy — Same Logic
Hydration enthalpy follows exactly the same pattern: higher charge density (smaller, more highly charged ions) = stronger attraction to the polar water molecules = more exothermic (more negative) hydration enthalpy.
| Comparison | Result | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| F⁻ vs Cl⁻ | F⁻ has more negative ΔhydH | F⁻ is smaller → higher charge density |
| Mg²⁺ vs Ba²⁺ | Mg²⁺ has more negative ΔhydH | Mg²⁺ is smaller (same charge) → higher charge density |
Predict, with reasoning, which would have a more exothermic lattice energy: LiF or NaCl.
What to Memorise
Concepts Checklist
Exam Tips & Common Mistakes
Sign errors are the #1 killer. Before substituting numbers, write out the full equation symbolically first (e.g. ΔlattH = ΔfH − Δ1H) and only then plug in values, keeping every negative sign in brackets. Rushing straight to numbers is where most marks are lost.
Forgetting to double/halve. For compounds like MgCl₂ or MgO where one ion appears more than once (or where atomisation starts from a diatomic element), always check the mole ratio before you calculate — a very common way marks are dropped.
Mixing up direct vs indirect routes. The value you're asked to calculate is always the "direct route" arrow in the cycle. Everything else forms the "indirect route." Label both clearly on your diagram before writing any equation — examiners give method marks for a correctly labelled cycle even if the final number is wrong.
Assuming electron affinity is always exothermic. Only the first electron affinity is (almost) always exothermic. Any subsequent electron affinity (adding to an already-negative ion) is endothermic — this catches students out constantly with O²⁻ and S²⁻ compounds.
State symbols matter for marks. Examiners specifically check that atomisation starts from the correct standard state (s), (l), or (g) for the element in question — get this wrong and you lose marks even if your enthalpy value is correct.
"Explain" questions on trends need both radius AND reasoning. Don't just say "the ion is bigger" — explain why that makes the electrostatic attraction weaker (charge spread over a larger volume, greater distance between ion centres). Examiners want the mechanism, not just the observation.
Don't forget entropy in solubility questions. If asked to explain why an ionic compound is or isn't soluble, and ΔsolH alone doesn't obviously explain it (e.g. it's endothermic but the compound still dissolves), you almost certainly need to bring in ΔStotal using the T-dependent formula.
- 5. Enthalpy of Solution & Hydration
- 6. Enthalpy Trends: Ionic Charge & Radius
- Exam Tips & Common Mistakes
Read the full Energetics notes free
That's the preview — create a free account to read the rest, plus flashcards and practice questions with instant AI marking. No credit card.
Unlock the full notes free →