Electric Fields
Revise Electric Fields for Physics (IAL) — revision notes and instant AI marking. Free to start.
Electric Fields
The Big Idea: any charged object creates an invisible "zone of influence" around itself — an electric field — and any other charge that enters that zone feels a push or a pull, whose strength depends on how much charge is involved and how far apart they are.
- Defining an electric field — a region where a charged particle feels a force, created by all charges around it.
- Electric field strength (E) — force per unit charge on a positive test charge; a vector, points away from + and towards −.
- Coulomb's Law — the force between two point charges: proportional to the charges, inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
- Field due to a point charge — radial field, obeys an inverse-square law (1/r²).
- Field & potential relationship — E is the gradient of the potential-distance graph.
- Uniform fields between parallel plates — E = V/d, constant field strength everywhere between the plates.
- Electric potential (V) in a radial field — work done per unit charge bringing a test charge from infinity; follows a 1/r relationship (not 1/r²).
- Representing fields — field lines (direction + strength) and equipotential lines (surfaces of equal potential, always perpendicular to field lines).
What actually is an electric field?
Think of any charged object — a balloon you've rubbed on your jumper, an electron, a proton — as constantly "broadcasting" its presence into the space around it. That broadcast is the electric field. Formally:
Crucially, the charged particle sitting in that field doesn't need to be moving — it feels the force whether it's stationary or in motion. This is a really important distinction from magnetic fields, where a charge only feels a force if it's .
Every charged particle creates its own field, and that field exerts an electrostatic force (FE) on any other charged particle that happens to be within range. The two golden rules of how charges interact:
- Like charges repel (+ and +, or − and −) — the force pushes them apart.
- Opposite charges attract (+ and −) — the force pulls them together.
And the size of that force isn't fixed — it changes with distance. Charges close together feel a much stronger push or pull than charges far apart. (We'll quantify exactly how much in Coulomb's Law below.)
Measuring "how strong" a field is at a point
Saying "there's an electric field here" is a bit like saying "it's windy outside" — useful, but not precise. To be precise, physicists define electric field strength, E, at a point as:
Why specifically a test charge? Because it fixes the direction convention. If we always imagine dropping a tiny positive charge into the field and asking "which way does it get pushed", then:
- Field lines point away from a positive charge (it repels our positive test charge).
- Field lines point towards a negative charge (it attracts our positive test charge).
E is a vector — it has both a size and a direction, and that direction is exactly the direction of the field lines.
Step 1: Rearrange E = F/Q → Q = F/E
Step 2: Q = 0.3 ÷ (3.5 × 10⁴) = 8.571 × 10⁻⁶ C
Answer: Q ≈ 8.6 × 10⁻⁶ C (2 s.f.)
Quantifying attraction and repulsion
We know like charges repel and opposite charges attract — but Coulomb's Law tells us that force is. Think of it like gravity's electric cousin: instead of masses attracting, it's charges pushing or pulling, and the same "inverse square" pattern shows up.
Because of the r² in the denominator, this is called an inverse square law. It means if you double the separation between two charges, the force doesn't halve — it drops to one quarter (½² = ¼) of its original size. Triple the distance and the force falls to just 1/9th. Distance matters a lot.
The sign of FE tells you the nature of the interaction:
- If Q₁ and Q₂ are opposite signs → FE comes out negative → attractive force.
- If Q₁ and Q₂ are the same sign → FE comes out positive → repulsive force.
Step 1: Q₁ (alpha) = 2 × 1.60×10⁻¹⁹ = +3.2×10⁻¹⁹ C
Step 2: Q₂ (gold nucleus) = 79 × 1.60×10⁻¹⁹ = +1.264×10⁻¹⁷ C
Step 3: r = 2.0 mm = 2.0×10⁻³ m
Step 4: FE = (3.2×10⁻¹⁹ × 1.264×10⁻¹⁷) / (4π × 8.85×10⁻¹² × (2.0×10⁻³)²)
Answer: FE ≈ 9.1 × 10⁻²¹ N (repulsive, since both are positive)
The radial field
A single point charge (or a charged sphere) produces a radial field — picture field lines spreading out symmetrically in every direction like sun rays, or sucking inward symmetrically for a negative charge.
Notice this is just Coulomb's Law with one of the two charges removed — because here we're not asking "what force acts between two charges", we're asking "how strong is the field itself, independent of what gets placed in it". This equation is only valid for the field around a single point charge (or equivalent sphere) — never use it for parallel plates.
Key features to remember:
- E is not constant in a radial field — it changes with distance.
- It follows an inverse square law (1/r²) — double the distance, and E drops to a quarter.
- If the graph of E against r is plotted, the area under the graph equals the change in electric potential, ΔV.
- For a negative charge, E works out negative — meaning the field vector points the charge.
Q = −1.6×10⁻¹⁹ C, r = 2 m, ε₀ = 8.85×10⁻¹² F m⁻¹
E = (−1.6×10⁻¹⁹) / (4π × 8.85×10⁻¹² × 2²) = −3.6 × 10⁻¹⁰ N C⁻¹
The negative sign tells us the field points towards the electron (as expected for a negative charge).
Linking force-based and energy-based views
So far we've thought about electric fields in terms of . But there's a second, equally powerful way to think about them: in terms of . A positive test charge sitting in a field has electric potential energy due to its position — just like a mass has gravitational PE due to its height.
Moving a positive charge another positive charge takes work (you're fighting the repulsion). Moving it a negative charge also takes work (you're fighting the attraction, effectively "holding it back"). Either way, work done on the charge changes its potential energy.
This links E and V beautifully:
In plain terms:
- If potential changes rapidly with distance → field strength is large.
- If potential changes gradually with distance → field strength is small.
So on a potential-distance (V–r) graph, E is just the gradient at that point. Steep graph = strong field. Flat graph = weak field.
Since E is proportional to the gradient of the V–d graph, and Set X has the larger gradient, Set X creates the larger field strength.
The uniform field
Unlike the radial field around a point charge, the field between two oppositely charged parallel plates is uniform — same strength and same direction at every point between the plates (ignoring the fringing effects right at the edges).
What this tells us:
- Bigger voltage between the plates → stronger field.
- Bigger separation between the plates → weaker field.
The field direction runs from the plate connected to the positive terminal to the plate connected to the negative terminal. If one plate is earthed, treat its voltage as 0 V.
E = V/d is only for parallel plates (uniform fields). Never use it for a
point charge — for that you need E = Q/(4πε₀r²). Mixing these two up is one of
the most common exam errors.
Step 1: E = V/d = 7.9×10³ / 3.5×10⁻² = 2.257 × 10⁵ V m⁻¹
Step 2: F = QE = 2.6×10⁻¹⁵ × 2.257×10⁵ = 5.87×10⁻¹⁰ N
Answer: F ≈ 5.9 × 10⁻¹⁰ N (2 s.f.)
Potential around a point charge
Electric potential (V) is a scalar — no direction — but it does carry a positive or negative sign depending on the charge that's creating it:
- Positive around an isolated positive charge.
- Negative around an isolated negative charge.
- Zero at infinity (this is the reference point).
Electric field strength E follows a 1/r² relationship.
These are genuinely different equations and different graph shapes — this trips up a huge number of students.
A handy way to remember the direction of change: potential always decreases in the same direction as the field lines, and increases in the opposite direction.
V' = Q/(4πε₀ · 3r) = (1/3) × Q/(4πε₀r) = V/3
Tripling the distance shrinks the potential to one third — because V is inversely proportional to r (not r²).
Field lines and equipotentials
Diagrams are a huge part of this topic, and examiners love testing whether you can draw and interpret them correctly. Two types of lines matter:
- Field lines — show the direction and relative strength of the field. Closer lines = stronger field. Always directed from + to −.
- Equipotential lines/surfaces — join points at the same potential. Always drawn as dotted lines (no arrows — potential is a scalar, it has no direction), and always perpendicular to field lines.
- Field lines: equally spaced, parallel, straight — constant E everywhere between the plates.
- Equipotential lines: horizontal, parallel, equally spaced straight lines.
- Field lines: spread outward (positive) or inward (negative), density decreasing with distance — this decreasing density is what represents E falling off with 1/r².
- Equipotential lines: concentric circles around the charge, spaced progressively further apart as you move outward (because V changes more slowly at greater distances).
For two like charges: field lines point away from both (or towards both), and there's a neutral point at the midpoint where the resultant field is exactly zero — no field lines pass through this point.
The single biggest source of lost marks: using E = Q/(4πε₀r²) for parallel plates, or E = V/d for a point charge. Ask yourself first — "is this a radial field or a uniform field?" — before picking the formula.
Both FE and E for a point charge have r² in the denominator. It's an easy term to drop under exam pressure — always double check before you calculate.
Charges are often given in nC or µC, distances in mm or cm. Convert everything to base SI units (C and m) before substituting — examiners specifically design questions to catch this.
These look similar but behave very differently as distance changes. If a question asks about potential at "3× the distance", the answer changes by a factor of 3 (not 9). If it asks about field strength, the answer changes by a factor of 9.
Mark schemes check for: arrows on field lines only (never on equipotentials), lines never crossing, lines touching the charge/plate surface perpendicular to it, and equipotential lines always drawn perpendicular to field lines.
A negative result from Coulomb's Law means attraction, a positive result means repulsion. Don't just report the magnitude — state clearly whether the force is attractive or repulsive when asked.
Read the full Electric Fields notes free
That's the preview — create a free account to read the rest, plus flashcards and practice questions with instant AI marking. No credit card.
Unlock the full notes free →